linux-kernel - Re: sched: memory corruption on completing completions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150205071032.GA3114@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:10:32 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched: memory corruption on completing completions


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> [...]
> 
> As usual, the paravirt code is a horribly buggy heap of crud. 
> Film at 11.
> 
> Why did I think we had this bug but already fixed it ? Maybe 
> it's one of those things that Waiman fixed in his long delayed 
> qspinlock series? Waiman? Or maybe I just remember the fixes 
> where we changed from a mutex to a spinlock, which fixed a very 
> similar case for non-paravirtualized cases.

We definitely had such a high profile bug in the native case, 
years before the qspinlock series came along. I don't remember 
the specifics anymore, but maybe it was in the VFS code?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/