lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:02:14 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	xiaomin1 <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>
Cc:	ralf@...ux-mips.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...izon.com, lauraa@...eaurora.org,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, d.kasatkin@...sung.com,
	takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
	Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
	Zhang Dongxing <dongxing.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE to io_tlb_segsize
 configurable as flexible requirement about SW-IOMMU.

This needs
    From: Wang, Xiaoming <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>

at the top of the message to comply with real name policy for patches.

On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 07:01 +0800, xiaomin1 wrote:
> The maximum of SW-IOMMU is limited to 2^11*128 = 256K.
> While in different platform and different requirements this seems improper.
> So modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE to io_tlb_segsize as configurable is make sense.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Dongxing <dongxing.zhang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: xiaomin1 <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>

And please edit that name here too. Or did you change your name after
submitting your previous patches?

> ---

This is a v2. So the subject should contain something like '[PATCH v2]'.
And it's nice to have a short list of changes here, below the ---
marker, so people can see what changed since v1.

Anyhow, I _think_ you took my comments on v1 into account. And by now
there's little in this patch that I could say anything interesting
about, so I don't really care that much.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

>  arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c |    2 +-
>  arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c  |    2 +-
>  drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c            |    6 +++---
>  include/linux/swiotlb.h              |    8 +------
>  lib/swiotlb.c                        |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> index 3778655..a521af6 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ void __init plat_swiotlb_setup(void)
>  		swiotlbsize = 64 * (1<<20);
>  #endif
>  	swiotlb_nslabs = swiotlbsize >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> -	swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +	swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
>  	swiotlbsize = swiotlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>  
>  	octeon_swiotlb = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(swiotlbsize);
> diff --git a/arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c b/arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c
> index f3d4ae8..eeffa8f 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/netlogic/common/nlm-dma.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ void __init plat_swiotlb_setup(void)
>  
>  	swiotlbsize = 1 << 20; /* 1 MB for now */
>  	swiotlb_nslabs = swiotlbsize >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> -	swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +	swiotlb_nslabs = ALIGN(swiotlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
>  	swiotlbsize = swiotlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
>  
>  	nlm_swiotlb = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(swiotlbsize);
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> index 810ad41..3b3e9fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> @@ -164,11 +164,11 @@ xen_swiotlb_fixup(void *buf, size_t size, unsigned long nslabs)
>  	dma_addr_t dma_handle;
>  	phys_addr_t p = virt_to_phys(buf);
>  
> -	dma_bits = get_order(IO_TLB_SEGSIZE << IO_TLB_SHIFT) + PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	dma_bits = get_order(io_tlb_segsize << IO_TLB_SHIFT) + PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
>  	i = 0;
>  	do {
> -		int slabs = min(nslabs - i, (unsigned long)IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +		int slabs = min(nslabs - i, (unsigned long)io_tlb_segsize);
>  
>  		do {
>  			rc = xen_create_contiguous_region(
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static unsigned long xen_set_nslabs(unsigned long nr_tbl)
>  {
>  	if (!nr_tbl) {
>  		xen_io_tlb_nslabs = (64 * 1024 * 1024 >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> -		xen_io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(xen_io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +		xen_io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(xen_io_tlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
>  	} else
>  		xen_io_tlb_nslabs = nr_tbl;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> index e7a018e..13506db 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> @@ -8,13 +8,7 @@ struct dma_attrs;
>  struct scatterlist;
>  
>  extern int swiotlb_force;
> -
> -/*
> - * Maximum allowable number of contiguous slabs to map,
> - * must be a power of 2.  What is the appropriate value ?
> - * The complexity of {map,unmap}_single is linearly dependent on this value.
> - */
> -#define IO_TLB_SEGSIZE	128
> +extern int io_tlb_segsize;
>  
>  /*
>   * log of the size of each IO TLB slab.  The number of slabs is command line
> diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
> index 4abda07..50c415a 100644
> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,15 @@
>  int swiotlb_force;
>  
>  /*
> + * Maximum allowable number of contiguous slabs to map,
> + * must be a power of 2.  What is the appropriate value ?
> + * define io_tlb_segsize as a parameter
> + * which can be changed dynamically in config file for special usage.
> + * The complexity of {map,unmap}_single is linearly dependent on this value.
> + */
> +int io_tlb_segsize = 128;
> +
> +/*
>   * Used to do a quick range check in swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single and
>   * swiotlb_tbl_sync_single_*, to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this
>   * API.
> @@ -97,12 +106,20 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(io_tlb_lock);
>  static int late_alloc;
>  
>  static int __init
> +setup_io_tlb_segsize(char *str)
> +{
> +	get_option(&str, &io_tlb_segsize);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +__setup("io_tlb_segsize=", setup_io_tlb_segsize);
> +
> +static int __init
>  setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str)
>  {
>  	if (isdigit(*str)) {
>  		io_tlb_nslabs = simple_strtoul(str, &str, 0);
> -		/* avoid tail segment of size < IO_TLB_SEGSIZE */
> -		io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +		/* avoid tail segment of size < io_tlb_segsize */
> +		io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
>  	}
>  	if (*str == ',')
>  		++str;
> @@ -183,7 +200,7 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Allocate and initialize the free list array.  This array is used
> -	 * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to IO_TLB_SEGSIZE
> +	 * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to io_tlb_segsize
>  	 * between io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end.
>  	 */
>  	io_tlb_list = memblock_virt_alloc(
> @@ -193,7 +210,7 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
>  				PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs * sizeof(phys_addr_t)),
>  				PAGE_SIZE);
>  	for (i = 0; i < io_tlb_nslabs; i++) {
> -		io_tlb_list[i] = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +		io_tlb_list[i] = io_tlb_segsize - OFFSET(i, io_tlb_segsize);
>  		io_tlb_orig_addr[i] = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
>  	}
>  	io_tlb_index = 0;
> @@ -217,7 +234,7 @@ swiotlb_init(int verbose)
>  
>  	if (!io_tlb_nslabs) {
>  		io_tlb_nslabs = (default_size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> -		io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +		io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
>  	}
>  
>  	bytes = io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> @@ -249,7 +266,7 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
>  
>  	if (!io_tlb_nslabs) {
>  		io_tlb_nslabs = (default_size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> -		io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +		io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, io_tlb_segsize);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -308,7 +325,7 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Allocate and initialize the free list array.  This array is used
> -	 * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to IO_TLB_SEGSIZE
> +	 * to find contiguous free memory regions of size up to io_tlb_segsize
>  	 * between io_tlb_start and io_tlb_end.
>  	 */
>  	io_tlb_list = (unsigned int *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL,
> @@ -324,7 +341,7 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs)
>  		goto cleanup4;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < io_tlb_nslabs; i++) {
> -		io_tlb_list[i] = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> +		io_tlb_list[i] = io_tlb_segsize - OFFSET(i, io_tlb_segsize);
>  		io_tlb_orig_addr[i] = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
>  	}
>  	io_tlb_index = 0;
> @@ -493,7 +510,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
>  
>  			for (i = index; i < (int) (index + nslots); i++)
>  				io_tlb_list[i] = 0;
> -			for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE) != IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - 1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
> +			for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, io_tlb_segsize) != io_tlb_segsize - 1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
>  				io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
>  			tlb_addr = io_tlb_start + (index << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
>  
> @@ -571,7 +588,7 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>  	 */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&io_tlb_lock, flags);
>  	{
> -		count = ((index + nslots) < ALIGN(index + 1, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE) ?
> +		count = ((index + nslots) < ALIGN(index + 1, io_tlb_segsize) ?
>  			 io_tlb_list[index + nslots] : 0);
>  		/*
>  		 * Step 1: return the slots to the free list, merging the
> @@ -585,7 +602,7 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>  		 * Step 2: merge the returned slots with the preceding slots,
>  		 * if available (non zero)
>  		 */
> -		for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE) != IO_TLB_SEGSIZE -1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
> +		for (i = index - 1; (OFFSET(i, io_tlb_segsize) != io_tlb_segsize -1) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
>  			io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_tlb_lock, flags);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ