linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: sa1100: implement irq driver as proper irqchip driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALT56yPLS-OAuZ1ipt3jKWPSH6W0Nc7qOBmRMcgugEhPYXOCFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:22:40 +0400
From:	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: sa1100: implement irq driver as proper
 irqchip driver

Hello,

2015-02-04 15:19 GMT+03:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> <dbaryshkov@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a second attempt to move Intel StrongARM SA-11x0 IRQ driver
>> to drivers/irqchip/ place.
>>
>> Changes since V1:
>>
>>  - Added soc/sa1100/pwer.h header containing sa11x0_*_set_wake()
>>    prototypes.
>>
>>  - Removed spinlock from mask/unmask functions
>>
>>  - Minor whitespace changes.
>>
>> The patches are based on my previous sa1100 patches that can be found
>> in Russell's for-next branch or in linux-next tree.
>
> I have applied it and tested on the Compaq iPaq h3600:
> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Thank you. I'll probably wait for a couple more days for more feedback.
Especially from IRQ CHIP maintainers.

Thomas, Jason: any feedback on this version? If no, can you ack it
so that the patches can be merged through Russell's tree? If so, I
can maybe squash last two patches, so that the new driver will
be tied to old one through git internals?

Russell:any comments from your side?

>
> Very nice to see the SC and GPIO offsets in /proc/interrupts
> and very clean code, good work!

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/