[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150205171844.GL5285@mwanda>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:18:44 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] au1100fb: Delete unnecessary checks before two function
calls
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:20:27PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> The functions clk_enable() and clk_disable() test whether their argument
> >> is NULL and then return immediately.
> >
> > This isn't true for clk_enable().
>
> I stumble on an interesting name space issue once more.
>
The "once more" is the problem in this statement. Other people would
have stopped making the mistake by now. I am able to see your bugs so
you should be able to see your bugs as well.
>
> > It's frustrating that you make the same mistake over and over
> > and you are fine with doing that.
>
> I admit that there can be also risks with my update suggestions
> in similar ways to contributions from other software developers.
>
At times, I have told other people to stop sending cleanups until they
can at least fix a bugs to balance out the bugs they have introduced.
It's unacceptable to only introduce bugs and never fix any.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists