lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:15:52 +0100 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 0/2] x86/xen: add xen hypercall preemption On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:47:15PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > On 27/01/15 01:51, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> > > > > This v5 nukes tracing as David said it was useless, it also > > only adds support for 64-bit as its the only thing I can test, > > and slightly modifies the documentation in code as to why we > > want this. The no krobe thing is left in place as I haven't > > heard confirmation its kosher to remove it. > > FYI, I went back an reviewed my last v4 patch and folded the > xen_end_upcall() change into it instead. > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-02/msg00682.html > > This will be easier for arm/arm64 to make use of in the future since > there are fewer arch-specific changes. I had taken similar approach first and determined using pt_regs was safer after advice from Andy. I'll provide feedback on your new patchset. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists