linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: fix sst firmware path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:48:22 -0800
From:	Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Mengdong Lin <mengdong.lin@...el.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yang Fang <yang.a.fang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: fix sst firmware path

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 06:14:58PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:35:07AM -0800, Kevin Strasser wrote:
> > All sst firmware is provided under the intel directory of the linux-firmware
> > tree. By default this directory structure is kept when installing on a
> > target system. Change the path to expect a default linux-firmware
> > installation.
> 
> Applied, thanks.  It doesn't apply as a fix but that seems to be OK as the
> only request_firmware() I spotted there appears to use intel/ prefixed
> directories already.

I'm a little confused. Do you want me to submit a version that can be applied as
a fix? It seems to me that we want this patch in 3.19.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/