linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUX_f_M7EmV3OM_CeosjfqoMSkJrCgUBm0LKFFurFGRvGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 23:16:21 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:45:59 +0100
> Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Steve, this was a typo it's called tlb_flush not tlb_flush*ed*:
>
> Heh, yeah, I typed that entire line in by hand. Just be lucky that was
> the only typo ;-)
>
>>
>> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/tlb/tlb_flush/enable
>> 1
>>
>> [  391.090381] intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting
>> [  391.104491] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
>>
>
> Now, if you disable that (echo 0 to that file), do you still get the
> rcu lockdep splat if you suspend and resume?
>

YES, I get the call-trace again!

# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/tlb/tlb_flush/enable
0

# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
0

[ 2470.606222] intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting
[ 2470.628153]
[ 2470.628155] ===============================
[ 2470.628156] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[ 2470.628159] 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.9-iniza-small #1 Not tainted
[ 2470.628160] -------------------------------
[ 2470.628162] include/trace/events/tlb.h:37 suspicious
rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[ 2470.628163]
[ 2470.628163] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2470.628163]
[ 2470.628164]
[ 2470.628164] RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
[ 2470.628164] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
[ 2470.628165] no locks held by swapper/1/0.
[ 2470.628166]
[ 2470.628166] stack backtrace:
[ 2470.628169] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted
3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.9-iniza-small #1
[ 2470.628171] Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
[ 2470.628176]  0000000000000001 ffff88011a44fe18 ffffffff817ecf4d
0000000000000011
[ 2470.628179]  ffff88011a448290 ffff88011a44fe48 ffffffff810d6b57
ffff8800cc2660c0
[ 2470.628182]  0000000000000001 ffffffff81d35160 0000000000000002
ffff88011a44fe78
[ 2470.628183] Call Trace:
[ 2470.628192]  [<ffffffff817ecf4d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 2470.628198]  [<ffffffff810d6b57>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
[ 2470.628203]  [<ffffffff810b7459>] idle_task_exit+0x1c9/0x260
[ 2470.628208]  [<ffffffff81054c4e>] play_dead_common+0xe/0x50
[ 2470.628211]  [<ffffffff81054ca5>] native_play_dead+0x15/0x140
[ 2470.628216]  [<ffffffff8102963f>] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0xf/0x20
[ 2470.628219]  [<ffffffff810cdbae>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37e/0x580
[ 2470.628222] smpboot: CPU 1 didn't die...
[ 2470.628224]  [<ffffffff81053e20>] start_secondary+0x140/0x150

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/