[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150205191226.47b146c5@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:12:26 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:53:41 +0100
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> > See that if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))?
> >
>
> I have here...
>
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y
Yep, I knew that (you wouldn't get splats without it).
> Which old patch?
> "tlb: Don't do trace_tlb_flush() on offline CPUs" ?
Yeah, that one. In other words, just add this patch on the kernel you
just tested.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists