[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJAp7Ojud6UM97eDYdUhZxzzjNRw_47e5kqh4UxwDBMwFZpuoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:34:06 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] Documentation: dt: add common bindings for hwspinlock
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 02/05/2015 05:01 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
>> Will you send out a new revision of the binding? I would love to get
>> this integrated so I can move on with the dependents.
>
> Yep, will do as soon as I hear from Ohad on what to do with the patch
> "hwspinlock/core: maintain a list of registered hwspinlock banks" that I
> dropped from v7. Without that and dropping hwlock-base-id, I can't get
> the translations done.
>
My suggestion is to replace the global id-tree with a list of hwlocks
and iterate over these if we ever get more than one driver registered.
As long as #hwlock-drivers < log(#total-hwlocks) this should be
faster.
I would however argue that clients that would notice any kind of
difference are using the API incorrectly.
Unfortunately this is a somewhat larger change than just slapping DT
support on the framework :/
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists