[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1423229210-7313-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:26:50 -0500
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
To: Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] brcm80211: drop unreachable else case
the if/elseif/else is exhaustive - there is no 4th case given the
rssi_ctrl_mask = RADIO_2055_NBRSSI_SEL | RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G1_SEL |
RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G2_SEL;
so this unreachable else case (dead code) can be dropped.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
---
It seems that there are only three cases:
RADIO_2055_NBRSSI_SEL | RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G1_SEL | RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G2_SEL
The conditional call to wlc_phy_rssisel_nphy(... NPHY_RSSI_SEL_*) thus do
not seem to have a 4th case which would be covered by the final else.
If the final else is there to accommodate extensions then this patch is
of course wrong - in that case it would be good though to comment the
final else as it appears to be dead-code at the moment.
Patch was only compile tested with x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_BRCMSMAC=m
Patch is against 3.19.0-rc7 (localversion-next is -next-20150204)
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c
index 084f18f..99dac9b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_n.c
@@ -23041,10 +23041,7 @@ static void wlc_phy_rssi_cal_nphy_rev2(struct brcms_phy *pi, u8 rssi_type)
else if (rssi_ctrl_state[0] == RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G1_SEL)
wlc_phy_rssisel_nphy(pi, RADIO_MIMO_CORESEL_CORE1,
NPHY_RSSI_SEL_W1);
- else if (rssi_ctrl_state[0] == RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G2_SEL)
- wlc_phy_rssisel_nphy(pi, RADIO_MIMO_CORESEL_CORE1,
- NPHY_RSSI_SEL_W2);
- else
+ else /* RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G2_SEL */
wlc_phy_rssisel_nphy(pi, RADIO_MIMO_CORESEL_CORE1,
NPHY_RSSI_SEL_W2);
if (rssi_ctrl_state[1] == RADIO_2055_NBRSSI_SEL)
@@ -23053,13 +23050,9 @@ static void wlc_phy_rssi_cal_nphy_rev2(struct brcms_phy *pi, u8 rssi_type)
else if (rssi_ctrl_state[1] == RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G1_SEL)
wlc_phy_rssisel_nphy(pi, RADIO_MIMO_CORESEL_CORE2,
NPHY_RSSI_SEL_W1);
- else if (rssi_ctrl_state[1] == RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G2_SEL)
+ else /* RADIO_2055_WBRSSI_G1_SEL */
wlc_phy_rssisel_nphy(pi, RADIO_MIMO_CORESEL_CORE2,
NPHY_RSSI_SEL_W2);
- else
- wlc_phy_rssisel_nphy(pi, RADIO_MIMO_CORESEL_CORE2,
- NPHY_RSSI_SEL_W2);
-
wlc_phy_rssisel_nphy(pi, RADIO_MIMO_CORESEL_OFF, rssi_type);
write_phy_reg(pi, 0x91, rfctrlintc_state[0]);
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists