| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:33:29 +0800
From: Jim-Ting Kuo <jimtingkuo@...il.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] m25p80, spi-nor: Update id list of Macronix chips
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Brian Norris
<computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:44:04AM +0800, Jim Kuo wrote:
>> Update the Macronix chip IDs. And add two functions to m25p80.c to
>> support some undefined read/write actions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jim Kuo <jimtingkuo@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> index 85e35467..731f568 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> @@ -170,6 +170,74 @@ static int m25p80_erase(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offset)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int m25p80_write_xfer(struct spi_nor *nor,
>> + struct spi_nor_xfer_cfg *cfg, u8 *buf, size_t len)
>> +{
>> + struct m25p *flash = nor->priv;
>> + struct spi_device *spi = flash->spi;
>> + struct spi_transfer t[2] = {};
>> + struct spi_message m;
>> + unsigned int dummy = cfg->dummy_cycles;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + dummy /= 8;
>> +
>> + if (cfg->wren) {
>> + ret = nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WREN, NULL, 0, 0);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spi_message_init(&m);
>> +
>> + flash->command[0] = cfg->cmd;
>> + m25p_addr2cmd(nor, cfg->addr, flash->command);
>> +
>> + t[0].tx_buf = flash->command;
>> + t[0].len = cfg->cmd_pins + cfg->addr_pins + dummy;
>> + spi_message_add_tail(&t[0], &m);
>> +
>> + t[1].tx_buf = buf;
>> + t[1].tx_nbits = cfg->mode_pins;
>> + t[1].len = len;
>> + spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
>> +
>> + spi_sync(spi, &m);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int m25p80_read_xfer(struct spi_nor *nor,
>> + struct spi_nor_xfer_cfg *cfg, u8 *buf, size_t len)
>> +{
>> + struct m25p *flash = nor->priv;
>> + struct spi_device *spi = flash->spi;
>> + struct spi_transfer t[2];
>> + struct spi_message m;
>> + unsigned int dummy = cfg->dummy_cycles;
>> +
>> + dummy /= 8;
>> +
>> + spi_message_init(&m);
>> + memset(t, 0, sizeof(t));
>> +
>> + flash->command[0] = cfg->cmd;
>> + m25p_addr2cmd(nor, cfg->addr, flash->command);
>> +
>> + t[0].tx_buf = flash->command;
>> + t[0].len = cfg->cmd_pins + cfg->addr_pins + dummy;
>> + spi_message_add_tail(&t[0], &m);
>> +
>> + t[1].rx_buf = buf;
>> + t[1].rx_nbits = cfg->mode_pins;
>> + t[1].len = len;
>> + spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
>> +
>> + spi_sync(spi, &m);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> All of the above is pointless. The write_xfer/read_xfer functions are
> not even used. (They should probably just be dropped, since they're
> doing nothing as-is.)
>
>> /*
>> * board specific setup should have ensured the SPI clock used here
>> * matches what the READ command supports, at least until this driver
>> @@ -199,6 +267,8 @@ static int m25p_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>> nor->erase = m25p80_erase;
>> nor->write_reg = m25p80_write_reg;
>> nor->read_reg = m25p80_read_reg;
>> + nor->write_xfer = m25p80_write_xfer;
>> + nor->read_xfer = m25p80_read_xfer;
>>
>> nor->dev = &spi->dev;
>> nor->mtd = &flash->mtd;
>> @@ -261,10 +331,15 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = {
>> {"mr25h256"}, {"mr25h10"},
>> {"gd25q32"}, {"gd25q64"},
>> {"160s33b"}, {"320s33b"}, {"640s33b"},
>> - {"mx25l2005a"}, {"mx25l4005a"}, {"mx25l8005"}, {"mx25l1606e"},
>> - {"mx25l3205d"}, {"mx25l3255e"}, {"mx25l6405d"}, {"mx25l12805d"},
>> - {"mx25l12855e"},{"mx25l25635e"},{"mx25l25655e"},{"mx66l51235l"},
>> - {"mx66l1g55g"},
>> + {"mx25l512e"}, {"mx25l5121e"}, {"mx25l1006e"}, {"mx25l1021e"},
>> + {"mx25l2006e"}, {"mx25l4006e"}, {"mx25u4035"}, {"mx25v4035"},
>> + {"mx25l8006e"}, {"mx25u8035"}, {"mx25v8035"}, {"mx25l1606e"},
>> + {"mx25l1633e"}, {"mx25l1635e"}, {"mx25u1635e"}, {"mx25l3206e"},
>> + {"mx25l3239e"}, {"mx25l3225d"}, {"mx25l3255e"}, {"mx25l6406e"},
>> + {"mx25l6439e"}, {"mx25l12839f"}, {"mx25l12855e"},
>> + {"mx25u12835f"}, {"mx25l25635e"}, {"mx25l25655e"},
>> + {"mx25u25635f"}, {"mx66l51235f"}, {"mx66u51235f"},
>> + {"mx66l1g45g"}, {"mx66l1g55g"},
>> {"n25q064"}, {"n25q128a11"}, {"n25q128a13"}, {"n25q256a"},
>> {"n25q512a"}, {"n25q512ax3"}, {"n25q00"},
>> {"pm25lv512"}, {"pm25lv010"}, {"pm25lq032"},
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> index 0f8ec3c..a6c7337 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> @@ -545,19 +545,37 @@ static const struct spi_device_id spi_nor_ids[] = {
>> { "640s33b", INFO(0x898913, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
>>
>> /* Macronix */
>> - { "mx25l2005a", INFO(0xc22012, 0, 64 * 1024, 4, SECT_4K) },
>
> Nak.
>
>> - { "mx25l4005a", INFO(0xc22013, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K) },
>
> Nak.
>
>> - { "mx25l8005", INFO(0xc22014, 0, 64 * 1024, 16, 0) },
>
> Nak.
>
> (you get the picture)
>
>> - { "mx25l1606e", INFO(0xc22015, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, SECT_4K) },
>> - { "mx25l3205d", INFO(0xc22016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
>> - { "mx25l3255e", INFO(0xc29e16, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K) },
>> - { "mx25l6405d", INFO(0xc22017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
>> - { "mx25l12805d", INFO(0xc22018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
>> - { "mx25l12855e", INFO(0xc22618, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
>> - { "mx25l25635e", INFO(0xc22019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
>> - { "mx25l25655e", INFO(0xc22619, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
>> - { "mx66l51235l", INFO(0xc2201a, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024, SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> - { "mx66l1g55g", INFO(0xc2261b, 0, 64 * 1024, 2048, SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>
> This is a load of junk. You can't just remove table entries that already
> have a name entry. It's not my fault that flash vendors continuously
> output new flash generations that reuse IDs from the previous. We need
> name stability, for anyone who might be using these name strings to bind
> to the m25p80 driver.
>
>> + { "mx25l512e", INFO(0xc22010, 0, 64 * 1024, 1, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25l5121e", INFO(0xc22210, 0, 64 * 1024, 1, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25l1006e", INFO(0xc22011, 0, 64 * 1024, 2, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25l1021e", INFO(0xc22211, 0, 64 * 1024, 2, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25l2006e", INFO(0xc22012, 0, 64 * 1024, 4, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25l4006e", INFO(0xc22013, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25u4035", INFO(0xc22533, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25v4035", INFO(0xc22553, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25l8006e", INFO(0xc22014, 0, 64 * 1024, 16, 0) },
>> + { "mx25u8035", INFO(0xc22534, 0, 64 * 1024, 16, 0) },
>> + { "mx25v8035", INFO(0xc22554, 0, 64 * 1024, 16, 0) },
>> + { "mx25l1606e", INFO(0xc22015, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25l1633e", INFO(0xc22415, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0) },
>> + { "mx25l1635e", INFO(0xc22515, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0) },
>> + { "mx25u1635e", INFO(0xc22535, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0) },
>> + { "mx25l3206e", INFO(0xc22016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
>> + { "mx25l3239e", INFO(0xc22536, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx25l3225d", INFO(0xc25e16, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
>> + { "mx25l3255e", INFO(0xc29e16, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx25l6406e", INFO(0xc22017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
>> + { "mx25l6439e", INFO(0xc22537, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx25l12839f", INFO(0xc22018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx25l12855e", INFO(0xc22618, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx25u12835f", INFO(0xc22538, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx25l25635e", INFO(0xc22019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx25l25655e", INFO(0xc22619, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx25u25635f", INFO(0xc22539, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx66l51235f", INFO(0xc2201a, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx66u51235f", INFO(0xc2253a, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx66l1g45g", INFO(0xc2201b, 0, 64 * 1024, 2048, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>> + { "mx66l1g55g", INFO(0xc2261b, 0, 64 * 1024, 2048, SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
>
> You need to do a lot better job of documenting your patches (i.e.,
> describe why you're doing these things) if you want me to take them.
>
> What's more, the SFDP support you're trying to add should be done in a
> way where you *don't* need to muck with the ID table every time. With
> SFDP you can get most/all this information anyway, and devices should
> just be able to bind to this driver using a generic name like
> "spi-nor,sfdp" or something like that, instead of having to expand this
> table.
>
>>
>> /* Micron */
>> { "n25q032", INFO(0x20ba16, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
>
> Brian
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your review and comments.
The write_xfer/read_xfer functions actually are used in patch 2.
- read_xfer: for macronix_block_lock function.
- write_xfer: for sfdp_read, macronix_read_lock_status function.
Original read/write fcuntions can only support one type transfer I/O (such as
FAST_READ, DUAL_READ or QUAD_READ which was detected at begin),
and they also only support fixed cycle of dummy (bind with transfer command).
So the commands not related to data transfer, such as sfdp read, lock/unlock
are hard to use original read/write. That's why I built these two of functions.
I thought they are suitable for this condition.
Second, sorry that I directly delete original chip IDs. Some chips are not
supported by Macronix anymore, so I change the name to a more popular one
and keep the original device ID. I also add lots of new devices to the table.
I forgot that the name might still be needed by someone.
And you're right, the sfdp detection is no need to read IDs. I'll remove these
part of modifications in the next version. I hope this way can make my patch
function more simple.
Summary for next version:
- Document the patch better and more detail.
- Remove the part of ID modifications.
Please let me know if there are any other suggestions.
Thanks again!
Jim Kuo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists