linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54D41A60.8040702@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:35:28 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk
 instances

On 02/05/15 16:42, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:14:01PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Actually we can bury the __clk_create_clk() inside
>> __of_clk_get_from_provider(). We should also move __clk_get() into there
>> because right now we have a hole where whoever calls
>> of_clk_get_from_provider() never calls __clk_get() on the clk, leading
>> to possible badness. v2 coming soon.
> There's some other issues here too...
>
> sound/soc/kirkwood/kirkwood-i2s.c:
>
>         priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, np ? "internal" : NULL);
> ...
>         priv->extclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "extclk");
>         if (IS_ERR(priv->extclk)) {
> ...
> 	} else {
>                 if (priv->extclk == priv->clk) {
>                         devm_clk_put(&pdev->dev, priv->extclk);
>                         priv->extclk = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>                 } else {
>                         dev_info(&pdev->dev, "found external clock\n");
>                         clk_prepare_enable(priv->extclk);
>                         soc_dai = kirkwood_i2s_dai_extclk;
>                 }
>
> It should be fine provided your "trick" is only done for DT clocks,
> but not for legacy - with legacy, a NULL in the clkdev tables will
> match both these requests, hence the need to compare the clk_get()
> return value to tell whether we get the same clock.
>

Are we still talking about of_clk_get_from_provider()? Or are we talking
about comparing struct clk pointers? From what I can tell this code is
now broken because we made all clk getting functions (there's quite a
few...) return unique pointers every time they're called. It seems that
the driver wants to know if extclk and clk are the same so it can do
something differently in kirkwood_set_rate(). Do we need some sort of
clk_equal(struct clk *a, struct clk *b) function for drivers like this?

Also, even on DT this could fail if the DT author made internal and
extclk map to the same clock provider and cell.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/