[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1423238288.3377.83.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 16:58:08 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push
migration instead of pulling
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 13:40 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:04:20AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Well, the thing is, with or without this patch, the worst case is still
> the very same. The likelihood of actually triggering it goes down
> dramatically [*], but any spin_lock() has that O(nr_cpus) worst case, and
> that spinlock op isn't going away.
>
> Now, lowering avg/median cases is good, but don't kid yourself that the
> worst case is going to be better.
>
> People running -RT on big boxes had better be aware of this.
The folks I know of running -RT on big boxen isolate cores and nail
absolutely everything to the floor. The only way to survive in a big
box is to chop the thing into tiny pieces. A plasma cutter would be
even better.. 'course you could just _buy smaller boxen_ and connect
what you want connected, take the lazy path to big box solution ;-)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists