[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D423C3.9030105@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:15:31 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
t-kristo@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct
clk instances
On 02/05/15 07:45, Quentin Lambert wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2015 00:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> If you want me to I can enlarge the search to other directories.
>> Yes please do. And if you could share the coccinelle patch that would be
>> great. Thanks.
>>
> structclk.cocci is the coccinelle patch
> structclk-arm.patch is the result I got when applying it to the
> arch/arm directory
>
> Is there anything else I can do to help?
>
>
Thanks for the coccinelle patch. Thinking more about it, I don't think
we care if the pointer is dereferenced because that would require a
definition of struct clk and that is most likely not the case outside of
the clock framework. Did you scan the entire kernel? I'm running it now
but it seems to be taking a while.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists