linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/3] Slab allocator array operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502061239050.17507@gentwo.org>
Date:	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 12:39:28 -0600 (CST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	penberg@...nel.org,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Slab allocator array operations

On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

> I promised Christoph that I will performance benchmark this. I'll start
> by writing/performing some micro benchmarks, but it first starts to get
> really interesting once we plug it into e.g. the networking stack, as
> effects as instruction-cache misses due to code size starts to play a
> role.

Ok I got a patchset here with the options removed. Just the basic ops.
Should I repost that?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/