linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150206200653.009919583@goodmis.org>
Date:	Fri, 06 Feb 2015 15:06:53 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code on offline CPU

Paul,

I found a much better fix than adding the rcu_nocheck(). Simply have the
rcu check inside the condition check as well. This way the rcu splat
will only happen if the condition is set too. The condition doesn't need
the tracepoint enabled.

Now I'm thinking that I should push the first patch through my tree as it
only touches tracing. The second patch you can freely take.

Neither patch really depends on the other, but both patches are required
to make the splat go away. If Sedat could test these patches together,
and give his tested-by tag, that would be great. I'll run my patch through
my full series of tests and then push to linux next. You could take the second
patch and push that through your tree (linux-next). When both arrive, the
bug will be fixed. The two do not need to come in together.

Thoughts?

-- Steve

Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (2):
      tracing: Add condition check to RCU lockdep checks
      x86/tbl/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline

----
 include/linux/tracepoint.h | 2 +-
 include/trace/events/tlb.h | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/