[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150206162702.1bf4cfb4@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:27:02 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace
code on offline CPU
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:23:24 +0100
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:18:03 -0500
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> But the first patch is a much broader change and more generic which
> >> could affect many other locations as well. It is specific to
> >> tracepoints, where the tlb one is specific to a single instance. As the
> >> first patch affects all tracepoints, I want it in my tree.
> >>
> >
> > I may as well just push the first patch directly to Linus, as it does
> > fix false positives.
> >
>
> To be included in 3.19-final?
Yes.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists