[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUX24Foy_rCbFJct-vLri0vpZZi-Kp3NwUXjGZdiTLGwhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 00:02:47 +0100
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/tlb/x85: Fix splat of calling RCU trace code
on offline CPU
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:35:48PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 23:13:02 +0100
>>> Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > OK, so both patches go through Steve's tree.
>>>
>>> The second patch will require acks from those that maintain the files I
>>> touch.
>>
>> Yep, that is required either way. I will give it an Acked-by in the hope
>> that this helps. You have another version on the way, or have I lost
>> count? ;-)
>>
>
> Working on x85 and probably using ed as $EDITOR, it will take some time.
>
Here is proposal for v2 as a diff to the original posted to LKML.
- Sedat -
View attachment "2-2.diff" of type "text/plain" (1222 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists