linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers: isdn: act2000: capi.c: fix checkpatch errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOgR63dhGA4ULSACOSCBnU+uG_bMbegYY62o1etmRjo31BO9wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 7 Feb 2015 19:08:43 +0100
From:	Bas Peters <baspeters93@...il.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	"isdn@...ux-pingi.de" <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers: isdn: act2000: capi.c: fix checkpatch errors

I must have missed something. I fixed it on my end. Do I now resend
the entire patchset or just this particular patch?

regards,

Bas

2015-02-07 19:02 GMT+01:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 02/07/2015 08:06 PM, Bas Peters wrote:
>>
>> > This patch fixes the following checkpatch errors:
>> >     1. trailing statement
>> >     1. assignment of variable in if condition
>> >     1. incorrectly placed brace after function definition
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Bas Peters <baspeters93@...il.com>
>> > ---
>> >   drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c | 9 ++++++---
>> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> > diff --git a/drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c b/drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c
>> > index 3f66ca2..5d677e6 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c
>> > @@ -113,7 +113,8 @@ actcapi_chkhdr(act2000_card *card, actcapi_msghdr *hdr)
>> >                     m->hdr.cmd.cmd = c;                     \
>> >                     m->hdr.cmd.subcmd = s;                  \
>> >                     m->hdr.msgnum = actcapi_nextsmsg(card); \
>> > -           } else m = NULL;                                \
>> > +           } else
>
> It looks like a \ was lost on this line.  It should have caused a compiler
> error.
>
> julia
>
>> > +                   m = NULL;                               \
>>
>>    Documentation/CodingStyle has an extra rule for such case: *else* branch
>> should also have {} since *if* branch has {}.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> WNR, Sergei
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/