linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: optimize delivery of TSC deadline timer interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54D67685.5050205@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 07 Feb 2015 21:33:09 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, riel@...hat.com,
	rkrcmar@...hat.com, dmatlack@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: optimize delivery of TSC deadline timer
 interrupt



On 06/02/2015 21:51, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:16:59PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The newly-added tracepoint shows the following results on
>> the tscdeadline_latency test:
>>
>>         qemu-kvm-8387  [002]  6425.558974: kvm_vcpu_wakeup:      poll time 10407 ns
>>         qemu-kvm-8387  [002]  6425.558984: kvm_vcpu_wakeup:      poll time 0 ns
>>         qemu-kvm-8387  [002]  6425.561242: kvm_vcpu_wakeup:      poll time 10477 ns
>>         qemu-kvm-8387  [002]  6425.561251: kvm_vcpu_wakeup:      poll time 0 ns
>>
>> and so on.  This is because we need to go through kvm_vcpu_block again
>> after the timer IRQ is injected.  Avoid it by polling once before
>> entering kvm_vcpu_block.
>>
>> On my machine (Xeon E5 Sandy Bridge) this removes about 500 cycles (7%)
>> from the latency of the TSC deadline timer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 0b8dd13676ef..1e766033ebff 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -6389,11 +6389,15 @@ static inline int __vcpu_run(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  	    !vcpu->arch.apf.halted)
>>  		return vcpu_enter_guest(vcpu);
>>  
>> -	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
>> -	kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
>> -	vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
>> -	if (!kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu))
>> -		return 1;
>> +	if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu))
>> +		clear_bit(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, &vcpu->requests);
>> +	else {
> 
> Why the clear_bit? Since only kvm_vcpu_block in the below section
> sets it, and that section clears it as well.

You're right.

> Can remove another 300 cycles from do_div when programming LAPIC
> tscdeadline timer.

Do you mean using something like lib/reciprocal_div.c?  Good idea,
though that's not latency, it's just being slow. :)

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/