lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 23:14:53 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	borntraeger@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mtosatti@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.orgm, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	lcapitulino@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] rcu,nohz: add state parameter to
 context_tracking_user_enter/exit

On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > 
> > > Just a few things then:
> > > 
> > > 1) In this case rename context_tracking_user_enter/exit() to 
> > > context_tracking_enter() and context_tracking_exit(), since it's
> > > not anymore about user only but about any generic context.
> > > 
> > > 2) We have the "WARN_ON_ONCE(!current->mm);" condition that is a
> > > debug check specific to userspace transitions because kernel
> > > threads aren't expected to resume to userspace. Can we also expect
> > > that we never switch to/from guest from a kernel thread? AFAICS
> > > this happens from an ioctl (thus user task) in x86 for kvm. But I
> > > only know this case.
> > > 
> > > 3) You might want to update a few comments that assume we only deal
> > > with userspace transitions.
> > > 
> > > 4) trace_user_enter/exit() should stay user-transitions specific.
> > 
> > Paul, would you like me to send follow-up patches with the cleanups
> > suggested by Frederic, or would you prefer me to send a new series
> > with the cleanups integrated?
> 
> I would prefer a new series, in order to prevent possible future
> confusion.

Of course, if Frederic would rather push them himself, I am fine with
that.  And in that case, you should ask him for his preferences, which
just might differ from mine.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists