linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: axxia: match return type of wait_for_completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150208154429.GA15534@opentech.at>
Date:	Sun, 8 Feb 2015 16:44:29 +0100
From:	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
	Anders Berg <anders.berg@...gotech.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: axxia: match return type of
	wait_for_completion_timeout

On Sun, 08 Feb 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 05:31:25AM -0500, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int. as ret
> > is only used for wait_for_completion_timeout here the type is simply changed
> > unsigned long.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > Patch was only compile tested with axm55xx_defconfig
> > (implies CONFIG_I2C_AXXIA=y)
> > 
> > Patch is against 3.19.0-rc7 (localversion-next is -next-20150204)
> > 
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c
> > index 1decc88..9434824 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c
> > @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int axxia_i2c_xfer_msg(struct axxia_i2c_dev *idev, struct i2c_msg *msg)
> >  static int axxia_i2c_stop(struct axxia_i2c_dev *idev)
> >  {
> >  	u32 int_mask = MST_STATUS_ERR | MST_STATUS_SCC;
> > -	int ret;
> > +	unsigned long ret;
> 
> 'ret' being an int is kind of an idiom, so I'd rather see the variable
> renamed, too, like the other patches do.
>
thanks - was not renaming variables - only if a new one was introduced I
gave it a name that was related to the timeout use. Will consider that 
for some of the other cleanups then as well.
 
> Also, please combine the two axxia patches into one.
> 
done and resent.

thx!
hofrat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/