[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D73FA6.4090703@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 11:51:18 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function
call "ring_free"
> Do symbols which are not exported (no EXPORT_SYMBOL_(GPL)) cause conflicts?
How do you think about to mark more functions from your software module
as static?
> I was under the impression that those are module private.
> If they are indeed private then I would prefer to not rename them.
Would you like to help in avoiding difficulties around name space issues?
Will specific prefixes make understanding a bit easier?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists