[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150208004729.GA10472@omega>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 13:47:29 +1300
From: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] llist: Fix missing lockless_dereference()
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:30:44PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:08:21PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > A lockless_dereference() appears to be missing in llist_del_first().
> > > It should only matter for Alpha in practice.
What could one anticipate to be the symptoms of such a missing
lockless_dereference()?
The Alpha kernel is behaving pretty well provided one builds a machine
specific kernel and UP. When running an SMP kernel some packages
(most notably the java runtime, but there are a few others) occasionally
lock up in a pthread call --- could be a problem in libc rather then the
kernel.
> > Meta-comment, do we really care about Alpha anymore? Is it still
> > consered an "active" arch we support?
There are a few of us still running recent kernels on Alpha. I am
maintaining the unofficial Debian alpha port at debian-ports, and the
Debian popcon shows about 10 installations of Debian Alpha.
Cheers
Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists