[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1655784801.20150209131735@eikelenboom.it>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:17:35 +0100
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
To: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugfix 0/3] Xen IRQ related hotfixes for v3.19
Monday, February 9, 2015, 10:47:43 AM, you wrote:
> On 05.02.2015 21:07, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>
>> Tuesday, January 20, 2015, 3:21:04 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>> This patch set includes three hotfixes related Xen IRQ for v3.19.
>>> Sorry for the long delay to get these two regressions fixed, it really
>>> cost me some time to read and understand Xen IRQ code.
>>
>>> Patch 1 fixes the failure to register ACPI SCI interrupt on Xen
>>> domain0 by reworking acpi_gsi_to_irq(). I will backport it to v3.18
>>> too once it reaches the mainstream kernel.
>>
>>> Patch 2 fixes the regression in Xen PCI device passthrough(pciback).
>>> It's a temporary solution, I will send the formal fix for v3.20 and
>>> it has passed tests too.
>>
>>> Patch 3 fixes an issue found when reading code. There's no real bug
>>> reports related to this issue yet.
>>
>>> Great thanks to Konrad and Sander for testing fixes for these regressions.
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gerry
>>
>> Hi Gerry,
>>
>> Since these patches now are: tested, reviewed and have landed into mainline,
>> could you also provide the backports for 3.17 and 3.18 where required ?
> This would be my attempt of backporting those to 3.18 (I have not tried whether
> they would apply to 3.17 as well). Those seem to work when test-booting and
> Sander said he will give them a try as well. But better check yourself I did not
> mess anything up while backporting. One of the three patches seemed not to be
> required at all.
> -Stefan
Hi Stefan / Gerry,
Happy to inform you i have tested stefan's backport-patches on Intel and AMD:
- Patches apply cleanly to kernel's 3.18.6 and 3.17.8 and compile.
(hmm, 3.17 seems to be already EOL according to www.kernel.org ?)
- Fixes the subtle issues i had.
So .. Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
Thanks !
--
Sander
>>
>> The number of people running into these (subtle) issues with these stable
>> kernels seems to be steadily increasing.
>>
>> --
>> Sander
>>
>>> Jiang Liu (3):
>>> xen/pci: Kill function xen_setup_acpi_sci()
>>> xen/irq, ACPI: Fix regression in xen PCI passthrough caused by
>>> cffe0a2b5a34
>>> xen/irq: Override ACPI IRQ management callback __acpi_unregister_gsi
>>
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 1 +
>>> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 26 +++++++++++------------
>>> arch/x86/pci/xen.c | 49 ++-----------------------------------------
>>> drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 1 -
>>> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists