[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D8AF6D.3080001@free-electrons.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:00:29 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: cleanup wait_for_completion handling
On 02/01/2015 01:55 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int, this
> patch uses the return value of wait_for_completion_timeout in the condition
> directly rather than assigning it to an incorrect type variable.
>
> The timeout declaration cleanup is just for readability
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
> ---
>
> The variable used for handling the return of wait_for_cmpletion_timeout
> was int but should be unsigned long, where it was not in use for anything
> else and the return value in case of completion (>0) is not used it was
> removed and wait_for_completion_timeout() used directly in the if condition.
>
> To make the timeout values a bit simpler to read and also handle all of
> the corner cases correctly the declarations are moved to msecs_to_jiffies().
>
Not sure why you decided to put this explanation outside of the commit log.
It looks useful so I'd move it up.
> This patch was only compile tested for pxa3xx_defconfig
> (implies CONFIG_MTD_NAND_PXA3xx=y)
>
The change looks good, but I would like someone to test it on real hardware.
--
Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists