[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1502091055460.20425-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:58:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <khilman@...aro.org>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <len.brown@...el.com>,
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
<kgene.kim@...sung.com>, <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
<thomas.ab@...sung.com>, <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
<m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 1/3] PM / Runtime: Add an API pm_runtime_set_slave
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This API creates a pm runtime slave type device which does not itself
> participates in pm runtime but depends on the master devices to power
> manage them.
This makes no sense. How can a master device manage a slave device?
Devices are managed by drivers, not by other devices.
> These devices should have pm runtime callbacks.
>
> These devices (like clock) may not implement complete pm_runtime calls
> such as pm_runtime_get/pm_runtime_put due to subsystems interaction
> behaviour or any other reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pm.h | 1 +
> include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
This patch is unacceptable because it does not update the runtime PM
documentation file.
Besides, doesn't the no_callbacks flag already do more or less what you
want?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists