| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150209161527.GH3220@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:15:27 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...s.com>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jespern@...s.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH for-3.20-fixes] workqueue: fix hang involving racing
cancel[_delayed]_work_sync()'s for PREEMPT_NONE
Hello,
Can you please verify that the following patch fixes the issue?
Thanks.
-------- 8< --------
cancel[_delayed]_work_sync() are implemented using
__cancel_work_timer() which grabs the PENDING bit using
try_to_grab_pending() and then flushes the work item with PENDING set
to prevent the on-going execution of the work item from requeueing
itself.
try_to_grab_pending() can always grab PENDING bit without blocking
except when someone else is doing the above flushing during
cancelation. In that case, try_to_grab_pending() returns -ENOENT. In
this case, __cancel_work_timer() currently invokes flush_work(). The
assumption is that the completion of the work item is what the other
canceling task would be waiting for too and thus waiting for the same
condition and retrying should allow forward progress without excessive
busy looping
Unfortunately, this doesn't work if preemption is disabled or the
latter task has real time priority. Let's say task A just got woken
up from flush_work() by the completion of the target work item. If,
before task A starts executing, task B gets scheduled and invokes
__cancel_work_timer() on the same work item, its try_to_grab_pending()
will return -ENOENT as the work item is still being canceled by task A
and flush_work() will also immediately return false as the work item
is no longer executing. This puts task B in a busy loop possibly
preventing task A from executing and clearing the canceling state on
the work item leading to a hang.
task A task B worker
executing work
__cancel_work_timer()
try_to_grab_pending()
set work CANCELING
flush_work()
block for work completion
completion, wakes up A
__cancel_work_timer()
while (forever) {
try_to_grab_pending()
-ENOENT as work is being canceled
flush_work()
false as work is no longer executing
}
This patch removes the possible hang by updating __cancel_work_timer()
to explicitly wait for clearing of CANCELING rather than invoking
flush_work() after try_to_grab_pending() fails with -ENOENT. The
explicit wait uses the matching bit waitqueue for the CANCELING bit.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20150206171156.GA8942@axis.com
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...s.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 3 ++-
kernel/workqueue.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ enum {
/* data contains off-queue information when !WORK_STRUCT_PWQ */
WORK_OFFQ_FLAG_BASE = WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_SHIFT,
- WORK_OFFQ_CANCELING = (1 << WORK_OFFQ_FLAG_BASE),
+ __WORK_OFFQ_CANCELING = WORK_OFFQ_FLAG_BASE,
+ WORK_OFFQ_CANCELING = (1 << __WORK_OFFQ_CANCELING),
/*
* When a work item is off queue, its high bits point to the last
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2730,17 +2730,35 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flush_work);
static bool __cancel_work_timer(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork)
{
+ wait_queue_head_t *waitq = bit_waitqueue(&work->data,
+ __WORK_OFFQ_CANCELING);
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
do {
ret = try_to_grab_pending(work, is_dwork, &flags);
/*
- * If someone else is canceling, wait for the same event it
- * would be waiting for before retrying.
+ * If someone else is already canceling, wait for it to
+ * finish. flush_work() doesn't work for PREEMPT_NONE
+ * because we may get scheduled between @work's completion
+ * and the other canceling task resuming and clearing
+ * CANCELING - flush_work() will return false immediately
+ * as @work is no longer busy, try_to_grab_pending() will
+ * return -ENOENT as @work is still being canceled and the
+ * other canceling task won't be able to clear CANCELING as
+ * we're hogging the CPU.
+ *
+ * Explicitly wait for completion using a bit waitqueue.
+ * We can't use wait_on_bit() as the CANCELING bit may get
+ * recycled to point to pwq if @work gets re-queued.
*/
- if (unlikely(ret == -ENOENT))
- flush_work(work);
+ if (unlikely(ret == -ENOENT)) {
+ DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+ prepare_to_wait(waitq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (work_is_canceling(work))
+ schedule();
+ finish_wait(waitq, &wait);
+ }
} while (unlikely(ret < 0));
/* tell other tasks trying to grab @work to back off */
@@ -2749,6 +2767,16 @@ static bool __cancel_work_timer(struct w
flush_work(work);
clear_work_data(work);
+
+ /*
+ * Paired with prepare_to_wait() above so that either
+ * waitqueue_active() is visible here or !work_is_canceling() is
+ * visible there.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ if (waitqueue_active(waitq))
+ wake_up(waitq);
+
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists