lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	9 Feb 2015 11:45:42 -0500
From:	"George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To:	linux@...izon.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
	davem@...emloft.net, dborkman@...hat.com,
	hannes@...essinduktion.org, klimov.linux@...il.com,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	msalter@...hat.com, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
	valentinrothberg@...il.com, yury.norov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] lib: find_*_bit reimplementation

Sorry, I screwed up the bit-twiddling while messing with various options.
I was trying to get size == 32 to work; that should have been:

> 	tmp &= (2UL << ((size-1) % BITS_PER_LONG)) - 1;	/* Mask last word */

And you're right that LAST_WORD_MASK is a good wrapper.

Vasrious working solutions include:
#define LAST_WORD_MASK(bits) 	((2UL << (bits-1) % BITS_PER_LONG) - 1)
#define LAST_WORD_MASK(bits) 	~(~0UL << bits % BITS_PER_LONG)
#define LAST_WORD_MASK(bits) 	(~0UL >> -bits % BITS_PER_LONG)

I'm not sure which generates the nicest code.  It's 4 instructions
each way, with the last being 1 byte smaller:

0000000000000000 <lwm1>:
   0:   8d 4f ff                lea    -0x1(%rdi),%ecx
   3:   b8 02 00 00 00          mov    $0x2,%eax
   8:   48 d3 e0                shl    %cl,%rax
   b:   48 83 e8 01             sub    $0x1,%rax
   f:   c3                      retq   

0000000000000010 <lwm2>:
  10:   48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff    mov    $0xffffffffffffffff,%rax
  17:   89 f9                   mov    %edi,%ecx
  19:   48 d3 e0                shl    %cl,%rax
  1c:   48 f7 d0                not    %rax
  1f:   c3                      retq   

0000000000000020 <lwm3>:
  20:   89 f9                   mov    %edi,%ecx
  22:   f7 d9                   neg    %ecx
  24:   48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff    mov    $0xffffffffffffffff,%rax
  2b:   48 d3 e8                shr    %cl,%rax
  2e:   c3                      retq   


> Also, I think it is best to handle size==0 appropriately, meaning that
> one cannot dereference addr in any way (and certainly not addr[-1]).

Ah, okay; l I figured that was a safe case to omit.  But your solution is nicer
than mine overall.

It may be that omitting the mask *is* safe, but it's a lot of wading through
callers to prove it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists