[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D0FF3AEC.1020B%suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:02:11 +0000
From: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"mjg59@...f.ucam.org" <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
"al.stone@...aro.org" <al.stone@...aro.org>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
"Duran, Leo" <leo.duran@....com>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [V3 PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Add support for ACPI _CLS device
matching
On 2/9/15, 19:15, "Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 12:02:43AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, February 09, 2015 12:20:03 AM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> > Device drivers typically use ACPI _HIDs/_CIDs listed in struct
>>device_driver
>> > acpi_match_table to match devices. However, for generic drivers, we do
>> > not want to list _HID for all supported devices, and some device
>>classes
>> > do not have _CID (e.g. SATA, USB). Instead, we can leverage ACPI _CLS,
>> > which specifies PCI-defined class code (i.e. base-class, subclass and
>> > programming interface).
>> >
>> > This patch adds support for matching ACPI devices using the _CLS
>>method.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
>>
>> Greg, Mika, any problems with this?
>
>Is there some specific reason why this cannot be done in similar way
>than PCI already does?
>
>In other words, stuff _CLS fields to struct acpi_device_id and make
>match functions match against those if they are != 0.
That was my original thought. Then I realized that the acpi_device_id is
used
to create the device matching table, in which could contain several
_HID/_CID.
However, most of the added _CLS field would likely ended up being unused
and
taking up space.
In contrast to _HID/_CID, a driver is likely to match just a single _CLS.
So, I think it is cleaner to have just a dedicate struct acpi_device_cls,
and
a matching function for it.
Thanks,
Suravee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists