[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150210034847.GA30257@fury.dvhart.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:48:47 -0800
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Xavier Naveira <xnaveira@...il.com>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@....eng.br>,
ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: unhandled hkey event
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:44:26PM +0100, Xavier Naveira wrote:
> On 2015-02-07 05:22, Darren Hart wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 07:52:03PM +0100, Xavier Naveira wrote:
> >>Pressing Fn+Esc in a Lenovo Thinkpad x240 to lock the Fn keys generates
> >>an unhandled hkey event
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Xavier Naveira <xnaveira@...il.com>
> >>---
> >> drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 7 +++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> >>index c3d11fa..e61c43b 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> >>@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ enum tpacpi_hkey_event_t {
> >> /* Key-related user-interface events */
> >> TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_NUMLOCK = 0x6000, /* NumLock key pressed */
> >> TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_FN = 0x6005, /* Fn key pressed? E420 */
> >>+ TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_FN_ESC = 0x6060, /* Fn+Esc key pressed X240 */
> >>
> >> /* Thermal events */
> >> TP_HKEY_EV_ALARM_BAT_HOT = 0x6011, /* battery too hot */
> >>@@ -3717,6 +3718,12 @@ static bool hotkey_notify_6xxx(const u32 hkey,
> >> *send_acpi_ev = false;
> >> *ignore_acpi_ev = true;
> >> return true;
> >>+ case TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_FN_ESC:
> >>+ /* key press events, we just ignore them as long as the EC
> >>+ * is still reporting them in the normal keyboard stream */
> >>+ *send_acpi_ev = false;
> >>+ *ignore_acpi_ev = true;
> >>+ return true;
> >
> >No need to duplicate the logic here, just add TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_FN_ESC to the list
> >of fallthrough keys (right after TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_FN).
> >
> I don't see the list that you are referring to?
Just before where you add the new case, there is:
/* fallthrough */
case TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_NUMLOCK:
case TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_FN:
/* key press events, we just ignore them as long as the EC
* is still reporting them in the normal keyboard stream */
*send_acpi_ev = false;
*ignore_acpi_ev = true;
return true;
You should just be able to do:
case TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_FN:
+ case TP_HKEY_EV_KEY_FN_ESC:
Rather than duplicating the same logic below a new case block.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists