linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/18] sync opal.h with firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1423540744.19657.12.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:59:04 +1100
From:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:	Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	benh@...nel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] sync opal.h with firmware

On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 13:26 +1100, Stewart Smith wrote:
> This patch series takes a careful step-by-step process to sync the
> opal.h header file (definition of interface to OPAL firmware) with
> opal.h in firmware.
> 
> Each patch is designed to be as obvious as possible so that it's
> easy for someone else to prove that I haven't messed it up anywhere.
> 
> In the process of doing this, I fixed a few things in firmware too,
> so this matches skiboot at 4681ed9, which is a little after the most
> recent skiboot release (4.1.1).
> 
> The biggest change is moving the function prototypes for API calls
> out to opal-api.h.

Hi Stewart,

I'm going to be a total pain, and suggest that this is the wrong approach :)

I was on board until patch 15, where you have to add an #ifdef SKIBOOT to guard
an include, and you have to remove an include on the Linux side.

I think the better solution would be to pull all the common parts out into a
new file, opal-api.h. That file would define the API between Linux & Skiboot,
and absolutely nothing else.

Both Linux and Skiboot would continue to have an opal.h, which would include
opal-api.h, and then anything else needed on either side to make a functioning
opal.h - eg. other includes & definitions (SG_ENTRIES_PER_NODE).

It would also have the advantage that because opal-api.h is a new file, we can
get it synced from the beginning and not worry about all the whitespace &
rearranging patches. ie. there'd just be one patch on both sides to add the new
file and move definitions into it from opal.h.

If you don't violently disagree I'll do a patch for that and we can see how it
looks?

cheers

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/