linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: unisys: remove unused variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:50:06 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@...sys.com>,
	David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, sparmaintainer@...sys.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: unisys: remove unused variable

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:35:40AM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 04:31:07PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 05:22:16PM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 06:13:21PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > we were getting lots of warnings about _tempresult set but not used.
> > > > _tempresult was used in the macro ISSUE_IO_VMCALL_POSTCODE_SEVERITY
> > > > which was again using another macro ISSUE_IO_EXTENDED_VMCALL.
> > > > but the vallue assigned to it was never used.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > > 
> > > Your From: address, and this address don't match, so I can't take this
> > > :(
> > 
> > all my patches have been like this way, and you have taken them before :)
> > the reason its like this way - (already discussed with Dan Carpenter, reference https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/473)
> > 
> > we have strict DMARC check for the corporate mail server. DMARC = domain based message authentication.
> > So the mail i sent reached all the list subscriber from a different server than our designated server,
> > and as a result it is marked as spam in many places and I have already received a few complaints regarding that.
> > 
> > so at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/535 Dan said its ok for him, but depends on you if you want to accept.
> > And since you have accepted all my patches before so i thought it is ok with you.
> 
> I didn't notice it before, sorry.

no problem. we all know how much busy you are .. :)

> 
> > if you want I can add an extra From: line, but Dan has already given his commments for that at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/135
> > quoting him :
> > 
> > "If everyone starts using From headers like this then it becomes a pain to deal with."
> 
> It's not a pain to deal with on my end at all.
> 
> But as I've missed this in the past, nevermind, I'll take it as is.  Can
> you resend your outstanding patches and I'll queue them up after
> 3.20-rc1 is out.
i will resend them now or should i send after the merge window closes?
and on 07th feb you have added my two patches to staging-testing, but it still is not in linux-next, do i need to resend them also or they are in process so nothing to do from my side?

regards
sudip

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/