[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150210083339.GA999@katana>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:33:40 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] i2c: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc I2C Driver
> Thanks, Wolfram. I think I'm missing something here and would like to
> get it clarified, so I don't make the same mistake again in the future:
> I thought I've already sent these patches as a new thread, i.e., [PATCH
> v9 ...], isn't it?
Yes, but "In-Reply-To" was set and so my MUAs (mutt and Thunderbird)
threaded them to your first submission. Most people I know prefer to
have this not threaded.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists