[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1423517653-11359-12-git-send-email-edubezval@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:34:12 -0400
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To: Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com, amit.kachhap@...aro.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, amit.daniel@...sung.com,
hongbo.zhang@...aro.com, andrew@...n.ch, durgadoss.r@...el.com,
peter@...e.net, shawn.guo@...aro.org, aaron.lu@...el.com,
caesar.wang@...k-chips.com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
l.majewski@...sung.com, vincenzo.frascino@...com,
mperttunen@...dia.com, mikko.perttunen@...si.fi,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
bcousson@...libre.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 11/12] thermal: step wise: fix kernel doc entry
Update kernel doc entry and correct the format. Now
kernel doc does not complain about it.
In this change we reuse the comment that explain the
algorithm as a kernel doc entry. However, blank lines
are added, otherwise it will appear in a single paragraph
in the kernel doc output.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
---
drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
index fdd1f52..413ee30 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
@@ -27,22 +27,34 @@
#include "thermal_core.h"
-/*
- * If the temperature is higher than a trip point,
+/**
+ * DOC: Algorithm
+ *
+ * If the temperature is higher than a trip point:
+ *
* a. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISING, use higher cooling
* state for this trip point
+ *
* b. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, use lower cooling
* state for this trip point
+ *
* c. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, use upper limit
* for this trip point
+ *
* d. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, use lower limit
* for this trip point
+ *
+ *
* If the temperature is lower than a trip point,
+ *
* a. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISING, do nothing
+ *
* b. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, use lower cooling
* state for this trip point, if the cooling state already
* equals lower limit, deactivate the thermal instance
+ *
* c. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, do nothing
+ *
* d. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, use lower limit,
* if the cooling state already equals lower limit,
* deactive the thermal instance
@@ -169,16 +181,17 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
}
/**
- * step_wise_throttle - throttles devices asscciated with the given zone
- * @tz - thermal_zone_device
- * @trip - the trip point
- * @trip_type - type of the trip point
+ * step_wise_throttle - throttles devices associated with the given zone
+ * @tz: thermal_zone_device
+ * @trip: the trip point
*
* Throttling Logic: This uses the trend of the thermal zone to throttle.
* If the thermal zone is 'heating up' this throttles all the cooling
* devices associated with the zone and its particular trip point, by one
* step. If the zone is 'cooling down' it brings back the performance of
* the devices by one step.
+ *
+ * Return: 0.
*/
static int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
{
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists