[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150210072745.09ce84f4@grimm.local.home>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:27:45 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 linux-trace 1/8] tracing: attach eBPF programs to
tracepoints and syscalls
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:51:05 -0800
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > Looks like this is entirely perf based and does not interact with
> > ftrace at all. In other words, it's perf not tracing.
> >
> > It makes more sense to go through tip than the tracing tree.
>
> well, all of earlier series were based on ftrace only,
> but I was given convincing enough arguments that
> perf_even_open+ioctl is a better interface :)
> Ok. will rebase on tip in the next version.
That's fine. If this proves useful, I'll probably add the interface
back to ftrace as well.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists