[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150210123357.GF6659@leverpostej>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:33:57 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
"dianders@...omium.org" <dianders@...omium.org>,
"dtor@...omium.org" <dtor@...omium.org>,
"djkurtz@...omium.org" <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
"sonnyrao@...omium.org" <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
"linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: add disable-wakeup property for
gpio-charger
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:14:48PM +0000, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 10. Februar 2015, 12:00:30 schrieb Mark Rutland:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:12:24AM +0000, Chris Zhong wrote:
> > > add disable-wakeup for gpio-charger, if you set this property, system
> > > will not wakeup by gpio-charger.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/gpio-charger.txt | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/gpio-charger.txt
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/gpio-charger.txt index
> > > adbb5dc..a46e9bc 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/gpio-charger.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/gpio-charger.txt
> > >
> > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Required properties :
> > > - compatible : "gpio-charger"
> > > - gpios : GPIO indicating the charger presence.
> > >
> > > See GPIO binding in bindings/gpio/gpio.txt .
> > >
> > > + - gpio-charger,disable-wakeup : Boolean, charger does not wake-up the
> > > system.
> > When would the system wake up otherwise?
>
> a response for patch 2/2 suggested to move this to userspace (as deciding if
> the charger should be a wakeup source is not a hardware property) and Chris
> responded that he'll try to move it as suggested.
Great, that matches what I was thinking.
Thanks for taking the time to say this on the DT patch.
Getting part of a series makes review far more painful :(
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists