[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwxuMcNPU-C5p2hSWuNhJW+DOi3Py0NQ--Rw9_bv3md2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:58:55 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Will try your suggestion,
Nope, that wasn't it. It still hangs in the same place (I forgot to
get rid of the red hat graphical boot screen so I didn't see the oops,
but ..)
Looking more closely at the generated code, and the fact that the oops
was an access at offset 0x18 from a NULL pointer, it would *look* like
it's this instruction:
call *24(%rax) # MEM[(struct ablkcipher_tfm *)_48 + 8B].decrypt
in the asm. Very odd. That part doesn't seem to have changed at all
(it's the crypto_ablkcipher_decrypt() part inside the
af_alg_wait_for_completion call).
Ignoring whitespace changes and doing a
git show -w 1d10eb2f156f crypto/algif_skcipher.c
does make it clear that apart from the "iter" changes, the only real
difference seems to be to the usage of "used". But I can't judge the
iter changes. And maybe something else changed elsewhere.
Any other ideas? Al?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists