[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150210170604.GA21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:06:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH] module: Annotate nested sleep in resolve_symbol()
Because wait_event() loops are safe vs spurious wakeups we can allow the
occasional sleep -- which ends up being very similar.
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/module.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index d856e96a3cce..11d3bc18157e 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1225,6 +1225,12 @@ static const struct kernel_symbol *resolve_symbol(struct module *mod,
const unsigned long *crc;
int err;
+ /*
+ * The module_mutex should not be a heavily contended lock;
+ * if we get the occasional sleep here, we'll go an extra iteration
+ * in the wait_event_interruptible(), which is harmless.
+ */
+ sched_annotate_sleep();
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
sym = find_symbol(name, &owner, &crc,
!(mod->taints & (1 << TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE)), true);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists