[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54DA4E5A.8030100@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:30:50 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
CC: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] livepatch: get function sizes
On 02/09/2015, 06:31 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,25 @@ static int klp_find_verify_func_addr(struct klp_object *obj,
> else
> ret = klp_verify_vmlinux_symbol(func->old_name,
> func->old_addr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> - return ret;
> + ret = kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(func->old_addr, &func->old_size,
> + NULL);
> + if (!ret) {
> + pr_err("kallsyms lookup failed for '%s'\n", func->old_name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = kallsyms_lookup_size_offset((unsigned long)func->new_func,
> + &func->new_size, NULL);
> + if (!ret) {
> + pr_err("kallsyms lookup failed for '%s' replacement\n",
> + func->old_name);
> + return -EINVAL;
EINVAL does not seem to be an appropriate return value for "not found".
Maybe ENOENT?
regards,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists