[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54DA55CA.3080408@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:02:34 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
CC: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9] livepatch: allow patch modules to be removed
On 02/09/2015, 06:31 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
...
> @@ -497,10 +500,6 @@ static struct attribute *klp_patch_attrs[] = {
>
> static void klp_kobj_release_patch(struct kobject *kobj)
> {
> - /*
> - * Once we have a consistency model we'll need to module_put() the
> - * patch module here. See klp_register_patch() for more details.
> - */
I deliberately let you write the note in there :). What happens when I
leave some attribute in /sys open and you remove the module in the meantime?
> --- a/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> +++ b/kernel/livepatch/transition.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ void klp_complete_transition(void)
> for (func = obj->funcs; func->old_name; func++)
> func->transition = 0;
>
> + if (klp_universe_goal == KLP_UNIVERSE_OLD)
> + module_put(klp_transition_patch->mod);
> +
> klp_transition_patch = NULL;
> }
regards,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists