[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54DA808D.5070300@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:05:01 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die
On 02/10/15 13:49, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>>> index fe0386c751b2..4d213b24db60 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
>>> @@ -174,18 +174,19 @@ static int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
>>> return 1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int platform_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
>>> +int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>> {
>>> if (smp_ops.cpu_disable)
>>> - return smp_ops.cpu_disable(cpu);
>>> + return smp_ops.cpu_disable(cpu) ? 0 : 1;
>>>
BTW, we also need this
/* cpu_die must be specified to support hotplug */
if (!smp_ops.cpu_die)
return 0;
otherwise it seems that we can have a situation where cpu_die() does
nothing besides unexpectedly jump to secondary_start_kernel() before
generic cpu hotplug facilities expect it to.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists