[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1502110010190.10719@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:13:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kaslr: propagate base load address calculation
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Alternatively, we can forbid zero-sized randomization, and always enforce
> at least some minimal offset to be chosen in case zero would be chosen.
Okay, I see, that might not be always possible, depending on the memory
map layout.
So I'll just send you a respin of my previous patch tomorrow that would,
instead of defining __KERNEL_OFFSET as a particular value, introduce a
simple global flag which would indicate whether kaslr is in place or not.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists