linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3 0/6] rcu,nohz,kvm: use RCU extended quiescent state when running KVM guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:01:46 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	"borntraeger@...ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"lcapitulino@...hat.com" <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 0/6] rcu,nohz,kvm: use RCU extended quiescent state
 when running KVM guest

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:44:17AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:22:59PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On 02/09/2015 08:15 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Hi Rik,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 04:04:38PM +0000, riel@...hat.com wrote:
> > >> Apologies to Catalin and Will for not fixing up ARM. I am not 
> > >> familiar with ARM assembly, and not sure how to pass a constant 
> > >> argument to a function from assembly code on ARM :)
> > > 
> > > It's a bit of a faff getting enum values into asm -- we actually
> > > have to duplicate the definitions using #defines to get at the
> > > constants. Perhaps it would be cleaner to leave
> > > context_tracking_user_{enter,exit} intact as C wrappers around
> > > context_tracking_{enter,exit} passing the appropriate constant?
> > > That way we don't actually need to change the arch code at all.
> > 
> > If Paul and Frederic have no objections, I would be happy to do that.
> > 
> > Paul, Frederic?
> 
> Sure, that's fine by me.

And if it is fine by Frederic, it is fine by me!

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/