[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8761b9coq5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:18:34 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Annotate nested sleep in resolve_symbol()
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:12:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On which, we should probably do this.
> >
> > ---
> > Subject: module: Replace over-engineered nested sleep
> >
> > Since the introduction of the nested sleep warning; we've established
> > that the occasional sleep inside a wait_event() is fine.
> >
> > wait_event() loops are invariant wrt. spurious wakeups, and the
> > occasional sleep has a similar effect on them. As long as its occasional
> > its harmless.
> >
> > Therefore replace the 'correct' but verbose wait_woken() thing with
> > a simple annotation to shut up the warning.
> >
> > Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Seems to suppress the warning, and modules still work.
>
> Tested-by: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
OK, applied.
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists