| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvzY=uZcoa1rCJSqokLfDgXtZ=-sD6mc638Qxh-HDwYwXw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:02:31 +0100 From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, gmate.amit@...il.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Bas Peters <baspeters93@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pushpendra Singh <pushpendra.singh@...rtplayin.com>, manuel.schoelling@....de, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> Subject: Re: checkpatch induced patches... On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:00:29AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >> I'm half tempted to submit some patch like this to >> make it difficult to use checkpatch on files outside >> of drivers/staging. >> >> o Only allow checkpatch to be used with the -f/--file >> option for drivers/staging/ >> o Add an undocumented --force command line option > > Sure. We could try that. I once sent a patch to make -f generate a > warning about not wasting people's time, but this is also ok. > >> o Make --strict the default for drivers/staging > > Ack. FYI: We had already a heated debate on that topic. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/17/415 -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists