[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150211204220.GM24251@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:42:20 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, namhyung@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH perf/core 1/2] [BUGFIX] perf-probe: Fix to handle
optimized not-inlined but has no instance
Em Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 05:37:08PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> (2015/01/30 23:21), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > So perhaps I need a 'noinline' _and_ '__sched', so that I have a "optimized
> > no-inline functions which have only function definition but no actual instance
> > at that point"?
>
> Ok, actually vmalloc_fault is marked as a nokprobe symbol.
>
> $ grep vmalloc_fault -r arch/x86/
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c:static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c:NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(vmalloc_fault);
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c:static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c:NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(vmalloc_fault);
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c: if (vmalloc_fault(address) >= 0)
>
> All the symbols which marked by NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro can not be
> kprobed. And we now have <debugfs>/kprobes/blacklist special file
Ok!
> to get all nokprobe symbols.
> I'll make another perf-probe patch which looks the blacklist before
> trying define new events.
Ok, that will help, improving the error messages is a big priority.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists