linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/21] perf test: Fix dso cache testcase

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1423688955-8094-2-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:08:55 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/21] perf test: Fix dso cache testcase

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>

The current dso cache permits to keep dso->data.fd is open under a half
of open file limit.  But test__dso_data_cache() sets dso_cnt to limit /
2 + 1 so it'll reach the limit in the loop even though the loop count is
one less than the dso_cnt and it makes the final dso__data_fd() after
the loop meaningless.

I guess the intention was dsos[0]->data.fd is open before the last open
and gets closed after it.  So add an assert before the last open.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422585209-32742-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c b/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
index caaf37f079b1..22a8c428283a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ int test__dso_data_cache(void)
 	limit = nr * 4;
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to set file limit", !set_fd_limit(limit));
 
-	/* and this is now our dso open FDs limit + 1 extra */
-	dso_cnt = limit / 2 + 1;
+	/* and this is now our dso open FDs limit */
+	dso_cnt = limit / 2;
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to create dsos\n",
 		!dsos__create(dso_cnt, TEST_FILE_SIZE));
 
@@ -268,7 +268,10 @@ int test__dso_data_cache(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* open +1 dso over the allowed limit */
+	/* verify the first one is already open */
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("dsos[0] is not open", dsos[0]->data.fd != -1);
+
+	/* open +1 dso to reach the allowed limit */
 	fd = dso__data_fd(dsos[i], &machine);
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to get fd", fd > 0);
 
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/