[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54DC906D.60009@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:37:17 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] r8152: separate USB_RX_EARLY_AGG
Hello.
On 2/12/2015 5:36 AM, Hayes Wang wrote:
> [...]
>>> + ocp_data = tp->coalesce / 8;
>> Why not do it in the initializer?
> This is for patch #3. The patch #3 would use this function.
The new function is already called in this patch.
> The unit of the relative setting from the ethtool is 1 us.
> However, the unit for the hw is 8 us. Therefore, I save the
> value with the unit of 1 us, and transfer it to the unit of
> the hw when setting.
You're replying to the question I didn't ask. I was just suggesting:
u32 ocp_data = tp->coalesce / 8;
>>> + ocp_write_word(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, USB_RX_EARLY_TIMEOUT, ocp_data);
... if you don't want to pass 'tp->coalesce / 8' directly here.
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void r8153_set_rx_early_size(struct r8152 *tp)
>>> +{
>>> + struct net_device *dev = tp->netdev;
>> Not sure you actually need this variable.
> If I replace dev->mtu with tp->netdev->mtu, the line would
> more than 80 characters. This is used to avoid it. Should
> I remove it?
OK, you can keep it.
>>> + u32 ocp_data;
>>> +
>>> + ocp_data = (agg_buf_sz - dev->mtu - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - VLAN_HLEN) / 4;
>> Why not in initializer?
> This is for patch #2. The patch #2 would use this function.
The new function is again used in this patch already.
> It has to be re-calculated when the mtu is changed, or the
> function is called when the linking status changes to ON.
You're again replying to the question I didn't ask. I was just suggesting:
u32 ocp_data = (agg_buf_sz - dev->mtu - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - VLAN_HLEN) / 4;
>>> + ocp_write_word(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, USB_RX_EARLY_SIZE, ocp_data);
... if you don't want to pass that expression directly here.
[...]
>>> @@ -3911,6 +3907,13 @@ static int rtl8152_probe(struct
>>> usb_interface *intf,
>>> tp->mii.reg_num_mask = 0x1f;
>>> tp->mii.phy_id = R8152_PHY_ID;
>>>
>>> + if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_SUPER)
>>> + tp->coalesce = COALESCE_SUPER;
>>> + else if (udev->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH)
>>> + tp->coalesce = COALESCE_HIGH;
>>> + else
>>> + tp->coalesce = COALESCE_SLOW;
>> This is asking to be a *switch* statement.
> Excuse me. I don't understand what you mean.
switch (udev->speed) {
case USB_SPEED_SUPER:
tp->coalesce = COALESCE_SUPER;
break;
case USB_SPEED_HIGH:
tp->coalesce = COALESCE_HIGH;
break;
default:
tp->coalesce = COALESCE_SLOW;
}
> The usb speed is determined when the device is plugged on
> the usb host controller or usb hub. The usb speed wouldn't
> chage unless you unplug the device and plug it to another
> port with different usb speed. Therefore, I provide different
> default values for different usb speed.
I didn't ask for explanations here either. :-)
> Best Regards,
> Hayes
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists