[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150212121214.GA18860@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:12:14 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > index a8c9062..66cbf38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > @@ -879,6 +879,10 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dwc);
> > dwc3_cache_hwparams(dwc);
> >
> > + ret = dwc3_ulpi_init(dwc);
>
> If I understood correctly, this call will result in enumerating the phy
> via ULPI bus, then registering the correct ULPI device.
> Can you guarantee ULPI will be always accessible at this point if we
> remove dwc3 module and load it again?
OK, got it. So yes, I can guarantee that ULPI will be acessible at
this point. If we are in a state where we could soft reset dwc3, we
know we can access ULPI. The fact that dwc3 itself expects to be able
to write to the ULPI registers at that point guarantees it for us.
So in practice when ever dwc3 is powered we will be able to access
ULPI for as long as the USB2 PHY interface is not suspended separately
with GUSB2PHYCFG SusPHY bit. And even then we would only need to
resume it with the same bit and ULPI is accessible again.
Cheers,
--
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists